Consequences for building owners that do not replace Grenfell-style cladding
UK government threatens to 'name and shame' owners that do not remove dangerous cladding.
Building owners who do not use a new £200 million fund to remove dangerous cladding, 26 months after the Grenfell Tower Fire, will face 'consequences', says the UK government.
Robert Jenrick, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government has said that building owners who do not remove unsafe aluminium composite material (ACM) from residential tower blocks will be punished.
"Let me be clear, inaction will have consequences and I will name and shame those who do not act during the course of the autumn," said Jenrick.
"There is no excuse for further delay – and for building owners to fail to take action now would be frankly disgraceful."
On 14 June 2017, Grenfell Tower caught fire and 72 people died after being trapped in the tower block as flames spread up and along its new cladding, triggering a countrywide government safety review.
In 2014, the government promised £400 million to replace the cladding on council-owned buildings and asked private building owners not to pass on the costs to their tenants. However, following several cases where individuals were asked to pay tens of thousands towards replacing the cladding on their homes, the government has set up a fund for privately owned buildings clad in ACM. Applications for the £200 million open on 12 September 2019.
£4 million of funding has also been released by the government for the collection of data on building cladding types by local authorities. It has been estimated that over 170 private housing blocks have ACM cladding that needs removing.
Funding of £10 million has been earmarked for the Protection Board, a joint project between the Home Office and National Fire Chiefs Council. This Protection Board will oversee interim safety measures in buildings clad with Grenfell-style ACM, updating residents and ensuring owners of these buildings 'are acting on the latest safety advice'.
"Our proposals are an important step forward in shaping the future building safety standards," said Jenrick.
"The new Protection Board will make sure building owners don't flout the rules, as well as ensuring fire safety risks in other buildings are being addressed," he added.
Changing the law when sprinklers will be required is also being considered. A commission has been set up to review lowering the height of a building where sprinklers must be installed from 30 metres, or 10 storeys, to 18 metres or 6 storeys.
These rules would only pertain to new-build housing blocks built since 2007, and do not apply to retrofitting anything built before then. The BBC estimates that fewer than one per cent of council-owned tower blocks have sprinklers.
Grenfell Tower, a 24-storey-high council-owned tower block, did not have a sprinkler system added during its £8.7 million refurbishment in 2016.